G
Works pretty well
Subjective observations and comments on the effectiveness.
Firstly- build quality- seems ok, tricky to fit. Like a lot of wind protection is seems overpriced. But options are limited unfortunately.
Only really effective with the additional wind jammer which cost an additional 69 euro or so.
Works fairly well in light to moderate breeze, I compared it to my blimp which was better unsurprisingly, but this item is much more compact and less attention grabbing.
Overall- more effective than a foam + windjammer, less so than a blimp. Compact, light and relatively discrete. It would be great though if we recordists had more cost effective options open to us.
Firstly- build quality- seems ok, tricky to fit. Like a lot of wind protection is seems overpriced. But options are limited unfortunately.
Only really effective with the additional wind jammer which cost an additional 69 euro or so.
Works fairly well in light to moderate breeze, I compared it to my blimp which was better unsurprisingly, but this item is much more compact and less attention grabbing.
Overall- more effective than a foam + windjammer, less so than a blimp. Compact, light and relatively discrete. It would be great though if we recordists had more cost effective options open to us.
1
0
Jelentem!
C
Doesn't protect against wind well enough. Does not deserve this price. Provides same level of wind protection with the stock foam of my AT BP4025 mic . Only useful if you put a wind screen artificial fur on it...
7
0
Jelentem!
PS
If you use this with the Audio-Technica BP4025, use a bit of talcum powder for a smooth mount, also: get the wind muff
I worked earlier with these Ball Gags and the wind muffs are pretty much a necessity. Also: I almost returned the item because the fit with the AT BP4025 was too tight. Then I used some talcum powder to overcome the friction and it fit like a glove.
2
1
Jelentem!